Data Sources & Methodology

Every benchmark, denial statistic, and cost figure published on this site should be traceable. This page documents where our numbers come from, how we decide what to publish, and how we correct errors.

Our Sourcing Standard

Statistics on this site come from three tiers of evidence, always used in this order of preference:

1. Published Industry Data

Peer-reviewed studies, government datasets (CMS, KFF), and published surveys from recognized industry bodies — MGMA, HFMA, CAQH, Experian Health, Premier Inc., Kodiak Solutions, and the AMA.

2. Payer Documentation

Payer provider manuals, fee schedules, timely-filing policies, and prior-authorization requirements — taken directly from payer publications, not second-hand summaries.

3. Operational Experience

Patterns observed across two decades of real billing operations. When a figure comes from operational experience rather than published data, we present it as a range and say so.

Key Statistics Used on This Site

These are the figures that appear most often in our guides and benchmarks, with their sources:

Statistic Figure We Use Source
Average initial claim denial rate ~11.6% (range 10–12%) Kodiak Solutions revenue cycle benchmarking; Experian Health State of Claims surveys; Change Healthcare Denials Index
Cost to rework a denied claim $25–$118 per claim MGMA (~$25 for physician practices); Premier Inc. survey ($43.84 average, up to ~$117 for hospital claims)
Share of denials that are preventable ~85–90% Advisory Board denial analytics; AHIMA denial-management literature
Annual industry cost of claim denials Tens of billions of dollars (estimates range ~$20–50B depending on scope) Premier Inc. (~$19.7B/yr in hospital administrative spend disputing denials); CAQH Index automation-savings analyses. Where we cite a single figure, it reflects the broader scope that includes physician practices and written-off revenue.
Clean claim rate target 95%+ (top performers 96–99%) HFMA MAP Keys; MGMA performance benchmarks
Days in AR benchmarks <35 days best practice; 30–40 typical; specialty-specific ranges in our benchmark report MGMA DataDive; HFMA MAP Keys; specialty society benchmarking
First-pass resolution rate target 88–93% HFMA MAP Keys; industry RCM benchmarking
Prior authorization as top denial driver 23–30% of preventable denials AMA prior-authorization physician surveys; Experian Health State of Claims; payer remittance (CARC) analyses
Marketplace / commercial denial variation In-network denial rates vary widely by payer (some near 20%) KFF Transparency in Coverage analyses of ACA marketplace plans
Timely filing limits by payer Medicare 365 days; commercial typically 90–180 days CMS claims processing manual; individual payer provider manuals (verified against payer publications at time of writing)

How Content Gets Published

Every guide follows the same process before it goes live:

  1. Drafted from operations — content starts from real billing workflows, not keyword lists.
  2. Checked against published data — every statistic is verified against the sources listed above. If we can't source a number, we present it as an operational observation and label it as one.
  3. Dated — every guide carries an "Updated" date. Benchmarks are reviewed when major industry surveys are released (typically annually) and after significant payer policy changes.
  4. Free of commercial contingency — no guide, benchmark, or recommendation is contingent on any commercial relationship. See our operating disclosure.

What Our Numbers Can and Cannot Tell You

Benchmarks are directional, not diagnostic. A "good" denial rate varies by specialty, payer mix, and state — a DME supplier and a primary care office should not hold themselves to the same number. Where possible we publish specialty-specific ranges rather than single figures. Your own remittance data is always a better guide than any industry average.

Payer policies change constantly. Timely-filing windows, prior-authorization lists, and credentialing timelines cited in our guides were accurate when written and dated, but you should always verify against the payer's current provider manual before acting.

Corrections Policy

If you find a figure on this site that is outdated, unsourced, or wrong, email hello@americanbillingassociation.com with the page URL. Verified corrections are made promptly and the page's "Updated" date is revised. We would rather fix a number than defend it.

See the Data in Action

The 2026 RCM Benchmark Report compiles these sources into specialty-by-specialty performance tables.