American Billing Association — Practice Self-Assessment

Revenue Leak Assessment Worksheet

15 questions across 5 categories  |  Max score: 45 points  |  americanbillingassociation.com

The average medical practice loses 15–20% of collectible revenue annually to preventable revenue cycle failures (MGMA; Capline Healthcare 2025). For a practice collecting $1,000,000/year, that's $150,000–$200,000 walking out the door. This worksheet identifies exactly where your leaks are.

How to use this worksheet: Circle or check the answer that best describes your practice today. Add up your points by category, then total all categories for your overall score. Match your score to the tier table at the end.
Scoring: 3 pts = best practice  |  2 pts = average, room for improvement  |  1 pt = below average, significant risk  |  0 pts = not in place / critical gap
Category 1: Front-End Eligibility (9 points)

27% of claim denials trace to eligibility errors — the single largest preventable category (MGMA). For a $1M practice, eligibility failures alone account for $27,000–$40,000 in annual revenue loss.

Q1. When do you verify insurance eligibility for scheduled appointments?/9 pts
3
48–72 hours before every appointment via real-time eligibility tool
2
Day-before batch verification for most patients
1
At check-in only, manually from patient's card
0
Only when a claim denies for eligibility reasons
Q2. What is your practice's eligibility-related denial rate?
3
<2% of claims deny for eligibility reasons
2
2–5% eligibility denials
1
5–10% eligibility denials
0
>10%, or I don't track this separately
Q3. How does your practice handle coordination of benefits (COB) for patients with multiple insurance policies?
3
COB confirmed at every visit via standard protocol; primary/secondary order verified
2
COB reviewed when patient reports two insurances; not systematically verified
1
COB handled reactively when a denial occurs
0
No formal COB process; handled ad hoc
Category 2: Coding Accuracy (9 points)

E/M undercoding alone costs the average practice 5–10% of E/M revenue. Coding-related denials account for 13% of total revenue cycle leakage (MGMA January 2026 poll).

Q4. How are your E/M codes selected (office visits, consultations)?
3
Provider trained on 2021 AMA E/M guidelines; documentation reviewed by certified coder; <1% coding denials
2
Provider selects code; periodic coder review; some undercoding identified in audits
1
Provider selects code; no external review; significant undercoding likely
0
No training on current E/M guidelines; undercoding rate unknown
Q5. How does your practice handle prior authorization for procedures?
3
Auth obtained before every scheduled procedure; verified against provider NPI, DOS, and CPT before claim submission
2
Auth obtained for known high-auth procedures; occasional misses occur
1
Auth obtained reactively after a denial; frequent rework
0
No systematic auth tracking; PA denials are a chronic problem
Q6. Do you use a claim scrubber or pre-submission edit tool before sending claims?
3
Automated scrubber catches NCCI edits, modifier errors, and LCD mismatches; >95% clean claim rate
2
Clearinghouse edits catch some errors; NCCI/modifier errors still get through
1
Manual review only; biller catches what they catch
0
No pre-submission scrubbing; claims go directly to payer
Category 3: Denial Management (9 points)

$262 billion in claims are denied annually in the US (HFMA). 50–65% of denied claims are never reworked (MGMA) — meaning most preventable denials become permanent revenue loss.

Q7. What percentage of your denied claims are appealed or resubmitted?
3
>90% of denials are appealed or resubmitted; denial rework is a tracked KPI
2
60–90% of denials get reworked; some fall through the cracks
1
30–60% reworked; significant write-offs from abandoned denials
0
<30% reworked, or I don't track this at all
Q8. Does your practice track denial root causes by denial code and payer?
3
Monthly denial analysis by CARC code, payer, and provider; root cause report drives process changes
2
Denial codes tracked in PM system; periodic review; some process changes result
1
Denial codes visible but not analyzed systematically
0
No denial root cause tracking
Q9. What is your average turnaround time to work a denied claim?
3
Denied claims identified and assigned within 24 hours; resolved within 14 days
2
Denied claims worked within 30 days
1
Denied claims worked within 60 days; some timely filing risk on rework
0
>60 days or no defined process; timely filing denials occur on reworked claims
Category 4: AR Follow-Up (9 points)

Claims beyond 120 days have <50% probability of collection (MD Clarity). Net revenue leakage from unpursued AR = approximately 3–8% of collectible revenue for average practices.

Q10. What are your Days in AR?
3
<35 days (top quartile for most specialties)
2
35–50 days (industry average range)
1
50–65 days (below average; cash flow strain likely)
0
>65 days, or I don't know my Days in AR
Q11. What percentage of your total AR is greater than 120 days old?
3
<8% of AR is >120 days (top quartile)
2
8–15% of AR is >120 days (industry average)
1
15–25% of AR is >120 days (below average)
0
>25% of AR is >120 days — collection probability on this balance is <50%
Q12. How frequently does your team conduct proactive follow-up on unpaid claims?
3
All unpaid claims followed up at 30-day intervals; payer-specific protocols; status documented per claim
2
High-balance claims followed up proactively; lower-balance claims worked reactively
1
Follow-up happens when AR report is run; no outreach cadence
0
Reactive only — only follows up when claim denies or patient calls
Category 5: Contract Compliance & Underpayments (9 points)

Commercial payer underpayments cost providers 1–3% of net patient revenue annually (Becker's); some studies put it as high as 11%. For a $1M practice, that's $10,000–$110,000 in missed revenue per year — accepted silently.

Q13. When did your practice last audit actual payer reimbursements against your contracted fee schedules?
3
Quarterly contract compliance audit; underpayments identified and appealed within 90 days
2
Annual audit; some underpayments identified
1
Audit performed once (at contract signing) — never since
0
No fee schedule loaded; no contract compliance audit ever performed
Q14. Does your PM/billing system have current, accurate fee schedules loaded for each payer?
3
Fee schedules updated within past 6 months for all payers; discrepancies flagged automatically
2
Fee schedules loaded but may be 1–2 years out of date for some payers
1
Some payers have fee schedules; underpayments are accepted as written
0
No fee schedules loaded; no way to identify underpayments
Q15. Does your practice track and appeal underpayments from commercial payers?
3
Systematic underpayment detection; all underpayments appealed within the contractual appeal window
2
Large underpayments identified and appealed; small ones written off
1
Underpayments rarely identified; occasional appeal when flagged by biller
0
Underpayments accepted as paid; no appeal process exists
Score Tally
Eligibility
___
/ 9
Coding
___
/ 9
Denials
___
/ 9
AR Follow-Up
___
/ 9
Contracts
___
/ 9
TOTAL SCORE: _______ / 45
Score Interpretation
36–45 Points
High-Performing Practice (Top 25%)
Estimated annual leakage: 3–7% of collectible revenue ($30,000–$70,000 per $1M in collections). Your fundamentals are strong. Fine-tune denial root cause tracking and benchmark yourself against the top 10% metrics in the 2026 RCM Benchmark Report.
27–35 Points
Average Practice
Estimated annual leakage: 8–15% of collectible revenue ($80,000–$150,000 per $1M in collections). There are clear, specific gaps. Identify your lowest-scoring category and start there. Implementing a claim scrubber and systematic denial rework protocol typically delivers the fastest ROI.
18–26 Points
At-Risk Practice
Estimated annual leakage: 15–25% of collectible revenue ($150,000–$250,000 per $1M in collections). Your revenue cycle has multiple systemic failures. An immediate eligibility and denial management overhaul is warranted. Consider whether your current billing model (in-house or vendor) is equipped to make these changes.
0–17 Points
Critical — Full RCM Audit Recommended
Estimated annual leakage: 25–40%+ of collectible revenue ($250,000–$400,000+ per $1M in collections). Your revenue cycle has critical failures across multiple categories. A full external RCM audit is the recommended next step before making changes — you need a complete baseline, not a partial fix.
What the Leakage Looks Like in Dollars
Revenue Leak SourceIndustry Avg Annual Loss (per $1M collections)Source
Eligibility-related denials$27,000–$40,000MGMA
E/M undercoding / code under-selection$20,000–$80,000MGMA; AAPC
Denied claims never reworked (50–65% abandonment)$30,000–$60,000MGMA
Commercial payer underpayments (1–3% of NPR)$10,000–$30,000Becker's; MD Clarity
Write-offs that were recoverable (AR >120 days)$15,000–$50,000MD Clarity
Total average recoverable leakage$102,000–$260,000Composite

Get a Free Expert Review of Your Revenue Cycle

A free 15-minute RCM audit puts a human expert on your specific situation — your denial codes, your AR aging, your billing model. Specific recommendations, no obligation.

Book Your Free RCM Audit →